Gaby Moawad, M.D., Endometriosis Specialist, Gynecologist, Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon
City: Mclean, VA, USA
Philosophy: Endometriosis has been considered for a century as implants of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus either following retrograde menstruation into the peritoneal cavity or following hematological dissemination. This implantation theory is attractive as endometriosis looks histologically like the endometrium, as retrograde menstruation contains living cells that can implant, and as the fibroblasts from endometriosis or from the endometrium of women with endometriosis have an increased invasion capacity.
The implantation theory does not explain why endometriosis lesions develop in some women only, while retrograde menstruation seems to occur in most women. Some observations are difficult to explain by the implantation of endometrial cells following retrograde menstruation. The clonality of each endometriosis lesion, as described for deep and cystic and typical endometriosis, is more consistent with a G-E (genetic-epigenetic) incident related to intracellular aromatase activity resulting in intracellular estrogen production than to newly implanted endometrium. The implantation theory does not explain the occurrence of endometriosis in women without a uterus, and in men. It is more likely that deep endometriosis lesions can become symptomatic more than 10 years after menopause in the absence of increased circulating estrogen as a result of a G-E cellular incident than that implanted endometrium would suddenly start to develop. It should be realized that theories such as coelomic metaplasia, endometriosis originating from bone marrow/stem cells, Müllerian rests, tissue injury and repair, repeated tissue injury and repair, estrogen toxicity and traumatic induction are compatible with and can be considered today to require epigenetic changes.
Recently, the G-E theory of endometriosis was formulated as an update of the endometriotic disease theory. Endometriosis starts in the G-E theory, irrespective of the original cell when a cumulative combination of specific genetic and/or epigenetic cellular incidents exceed a certain threshold. The inherited genetic and epigenetic incidents at birth explain the hereditary character of endometriosis. It remains unclear whether and how epigenetic changes are transmitted trans-generationally in endometriosis. The effects of minor G-E abnormalities remain clinically invisible because of the redundancy of molecular biological mechanisms in the cell, but they increase the risk of developing the disease when additional incidents occur. Additional incidents can occur during intra-uterine development because of the maternal environment and external factors, and during live mainly as mistakes during mitosis. Most G-E mistakes result in apoptosis of the cell if they cannot be repaired. Some minor incidents, however, do not cause cell death and are transmitted to the next generation of cells. These incidents are favored by mutagenic substances such as dioxins and other pollutants, radiation, or oxidative stress such as caused by retrograde menstruation or by infection or by the peritoneal microbiome. The dynamic and gradual aspect of these mistakes and their inheritance is important. The crosstalk between genetic and epigenetic mechanisms makes the cell vulnerable to new incidents, especially when the external circumstances are unfavorable. The cell thus becomes progressively more vulnerable to acquiring more mistakes, with some of them being cancer-associated mutations explaining the clonal expansion.
The G-E theory adds to the implantation and other theories that the onset of the disease requires a cumulative and triggering combination of G-E cellular incidents. With the G-E hypothesis, it seems logical to postulate that the specific set of G-E incidents will orient the development into clinically subtle, typical, cystic or deep lesions. A specific set of G-E incidents also explains that each type of lesion is heterogenous with variable aromatase activity, progesterone resistance, estrogen sensitivity and probably many other factors. Additional incidents occurring during further development result in endometriosis lesions which are probably also heterogeneous at the cellular level, as demonstrated for breast cancer.
After their triggered initiation, the lesions develop in an environment different from the uterus with different microbiota and different immunologic, endocrine and paracrine influences. The cyclic endocrine changes with eventual bleeding will moreover result in repetitive traumas which increase the risk of developing additional G-E incidents and ultimately fibrosis. Therefore, all theories emphasising trauma, immunology, the role of estrogen and peritoneal fluid retain their full importance for understanding the growth of endometriotic lesions.
Much of the many endometriosis-associated changes, such as changes in the endometrium and in the immunology can be viewed as a consequence of the inherited predisposition instead of being a consequence of endometriosis.
Although poorly understood, reversibility of epigenetic changes becomes more difficult when additional epigenetic incidents have occurred. When the associated genomic instability results in genetic errors, changes become irreversible.
Medication: OCP, Progestins including IUD, gabapentin, Lyrica.
OCP, Progestins are mainly used for suppression after excision
Gabapentin, Lyrica is used for central pain desensitization in preparation to or after surgical management especially for patients with chronic pelvic pain and amplified pain response
Approach to Persistent Pain After Surgery: Endometriosis excision surgery is only one part of the comprehensive approach to the management of endometriosis. Pain medicine has an important role in managing central pain and neuropathic pain, pelvic floor PT helps with myofascial pain associated with endometriosis, other ancillary services like nutrition and pain psychology, acupuncture has proven an added value in the management of endometriosis-associated conditions
Dr. Gaby Moawad is an excellent doctor. He is skilled, smart, kind, thoughtful and open minded. Not only does he make you feel safe and secure, he has a sense of humor and good bedside manner. You feel like a human when you’re under his care. Dr. Moawad was the first doctor to diagnose me after going undiagnosed for umpteen years and outlined a plan that maximizes my optimal health and wellbeing. He answers ALL of my questions, entertains, with patience, all of what I think I know, and he is willing to explore more than traditional methods for treatment to ensure a balanced approach. I highly recommend Dr. Moawad. He literally saved my life and offered me hope for a more comfortable and functional future!